Schools won in Indiana and Wisconsin federal district courts; those decisions were not appealed. Students won at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting en banc in a Pennsylvania case.
The nine-member Third Circuit majority determined that the “bracelets are not plainly lewd,” looking to Fraser, and comment on “an undeniably important social issue,” applying Justice Samuel Alito Jr.’s concurrence in another student speech case, the Supreme Court’s 2007Morse v. Frederick.
Five judges on the Third Circuit dissented.
What about “I ♥ vaginas” or “I ♥ testicles,” they asked, if couched as cancer awareness slogans? “[S]chool districts would be powerless to address” them.
The dissent also criticized the majority for treating Alito’s Morseconcurrence as controlling and for deepening a circuit split on the weight of Alito’s opinion (separate from the split about the bracelets).
No comments:
Post a Comment