[A]ttorney-argument was insufficient to prove invalidity and rather than some amount of extrinsic evidence (such as expert testimony) was necessary to provide the necessary clear-and-convincing evidence.Crouch, here, on elcommerce v. SAP
[A]ttorney-argument was insufficient to prove invalidity and rather than some amount of extrinsic evidence (such as expert testimony) was necessary to provide the necessary clear-and-convincing evidence.Crouch, here, on elcommerce v. SAP
No comments:
Post a Comment